Home > Places of Interest > The Archaeology Mystery Of The Bronze Age Mound

The Archaeology Mystery Of The Bronze Age Mound

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 4 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Archaeology Bronze Age Excavation

An interesting Bronze Age burned mound was excavated at a gravel mining quarry north of Leicester, England. The site lays within an area of open parkland at the Watermead Country Park bounded by nature reserves either side of the River Soar.

How Human Skulls Brought Notice Of The Mound

Attention was first drawn to the site when park wardens discovered two human skulls in debris from the quarrying. Leicestershire Museum Services were notified and they duly contacted the Archaeological Services department of Leicester University. A small archaeology group from the University visited the site and spoke with the machine operator at the gravel pit. He explained to circumstances surrounding the skulls' excavation and it was established that the material encompassing the skulls was from a peat deposit approximately two metres below the present ground surface level.

In light of the potential significance of the unearthing of human remains deposited in a British peat bog, English Heritage was immediately contacted. They approved funding of a archaeology programme to pursue environmental sampling in the area of the location of the human skulls.

Digging Begins At The Bronze Age Mound

Local volunteers then assisted a small archaeology team from the University of Leicester Archaeological Services and began the programme of limited excavation recording all accessible areas within the peat bed. While the team was undertaking quarrying work they happened to expose an upright timber post, the top of which appeared to have rotted off at the height of the peat layers, suggesting that it was either contemporary with the peat bed or pre-dated it in the past.

This discovery prompted excavators to expand their exploratory investigations in the hope of uncovering more posts or other artefacts. The alluvial clays were machined off over an area of some 200 square metres and a number of features were revealed and identified. Archaeology concluded that the first single post was really part of a five-post structure, with two parallel rows of apparently pile-driven posts, possibly part of an ancient bridge. Further archaeology site survey investigations revealed that previous quarrying with heavy machinery had cut away a continuation of the same line of posts that had once extended across the quarry site. The unfolding 'bridge' appeared to be crossing a peat-filled canal, conceivably an old course of the Soar River.

What Was The Burned Mound?

On the cut banks of this former waterway were found what likely represents the remains of domestic cooking activity. Archaeology remains of this nature are commonly referred to as a burned mound by archaeologists. The feature consisted of a stone hearth; a circular trough with a base lined with timber planks and with its sides consolidated using a withy basketwork lining; another charcoal-filled pit, smaller than the first; a gully and ditch; and a large spread of fire-damaged flints and quantities of ash but no real artefacts.

The ditch appeared to have been re-dug on several occasions having been in filled each time with rich organic material, peat-like, which may have taken some time to have decayed, suggesting a degree of longevity in the use of the ditch.

Full environmental sampling was undertaken that included bulk and column samples for insects, plant macro fossils, and pollen cores that would help date mound activity.

Studying the Human Remains At The Excavation Site

Palaeontologists are particularly interested in the study of the human remains from this excavation site. The bones examined by experts have identified two young males, either buried or deposited in the peat bed. Further close analysis exposed three fine cut marks on the back of one of the spinal vertebrae of one person, caused by a sharp tool. As the bone cuts demonstrated no signs of healing, the examiners point out that they were very likely sustained at the time of death and could possibly be the cause of death. The cuts are not evidence of decapitation. The light depth of the cut into the bone suggests more a slicing of the muscle cluster at the bottom of the neck. However, archaeologists add that it is not inconceivable that the marks reflect de-fleshing of the thick musculature that would facilitate an easier decapitation.

What Does The Burned Mound Site Mean?

This site is the first Bronze Age burned mound found in Leicestershire, England. Few peat bog sites have been fully excavated and their exact purpose remains poorly understood. Burned mound sites are normally interpreted as being cooking places. While domestic cooking is the activity that best fits the accessible evidence it has also been suggested that the site's purpose was steam production. The steam, produced by thrusting hot stones into baths of water, could have been used for sweat lodges or saunas, similar to those used by North American Indians. Bronze Age burned mound sites are always located beside large supplies of water and there is consistently a total lack of animal bone debris artefacts from the sites themselves.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • SimSam
    Re: Gender Archaeology
    The article "archaeology and the study of gender" by Margaret W. Conkey and Janet D. Spector is a marvellous read on the theme of gender in…
    17 October 2017
  • Dick
    Re: Shinichi Fujimura
    I found a buried artifacts made by a human ashes, a massive cremation of human body during either Spanish or Japanese occupation . Those…
    9 October 2017
  • Jason
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I found a, what seems like clay, pot with a little spout near a dried up canal and was wondering how old it was and if it is worth anything. If…
    2 October 2017
  • riju
    Re: Academic Qualifications to Be An Archaeologist
    Sir I have completed BSC in geology. Is It possible for me to complete msc archaeology without completing…
    1 October 2017
  • Ajju
    Re: Academic Qualifications to Be An Archaeologist
    Sir I m the student of commerce stream. Can I do the archeology and beacome archaeologist or no
    29 September 2017
  • ArchaeologyExpert
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Nat - Your Question:Hi,I recently found a piece of pottery near some Roman ruins. How would I send you a picture to confirm if it is actually…
    27 September 2017
  • Nat
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi, I recently found a piece of pottery near some Roman ruins. How would I send you a picture to confirm if it is actually Roman? It looks like a…
    26 September 2017
  • Rob
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I also have a piece of Zuni Pottery from the archives of the Smithsonian, collect by Bill Stevenson in 1880-1882. It is marked with a number and I…
    24 September 2017
  • Rob
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi. I have a Brownfields' Ferncliffe Pottery Drip Pan. It is heavy ceramic or porcelain and has impressed mark circle. It says Brown on inside and…
    24 September 2017
  • No picture
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    @stu. This is difficult to envisage without a picture. You'd be better taking it to a museum or something.
    20 September 2017
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the ArchaeologyExpert website. Please read our Disclaimer.