Home > Archaeology Myths > Pseudo-Archaeology

Pseudo-Archaeology

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 8 Jul 2016 | comments*Discuss
 
Pseudoarchaeology Greek False

The word ‘pseudo’ is a Greek word meaning false apparent or supposed but not real. When prefixed to the word archaeology the term pseudoarchaeology simply means false archaeology.

It can be false for a number of reasons. Firstly, the archaeological methodology may not be undertaken using accepted scientific methods. Secondly, the interpretation of the data or the material remains excavated may not be consistent with the usual practices of analysis. Thirdly, the artefacts ‘discovered’ could be fakes or the entire archaeological concept could be orchestrated as a hoax.

False Science

Pseudoarchaeology is sometimes called fantastic archaeology but by whatever name it is given it is best identified as pseudo-science dressed in archaeological garments. Any archaeological theory, excavation site, or published results of excavations that do not conform to accepted archaeological practices generally fall into the category of pseudoarchaeology.

Nationalism

A frequent motivation to engage in pseudoarchaeology is radical nationalism. Imperial ideologies of the recent past used the results of archaeology to advance their empires. Often it was considered necessary to fake the data in order to pursue a particular emphasis for the nation. Some nations thought that re-writing history via archaeology would benefit their political aims.

Other motivations to enter into this pseudo-science could be religious dogma, anthropological theory, or revisionist historical interpretation. Archaeology is often enthused by romantic myths and legends. If the real science of archaeology were to make a discovery that rendered the national tale as a proven myth then cultural history would be shaken. Some people feel that it is better to ‘rework’ the evidence than to alter fanciful history.

Notorious Examples

There is no serious rocket science to presenting archaeological forgeries. Any artefact that simply looks old and is somewhat obscure as to its identification can be presented to the public (and even academic professionals) and most will believe it if the presenter has some trappings of authority.

There are literally thousands of archaeological frauds, fakes, and hoaxes that would be termed pseudoarchaeology. Here are a few examples that reached to global deception.

  • Piltdown Man fossils: These were the fabrication of a human skull and a chimp jawbone in an attempt to prove human evolution. Exposed as a fraud.
  • The Cardiff Giant: Made by P T Barnum (of circus fame) and displayed as the original after the British Museum refused to release the one he said he had found.
  • Stone Age Japanese tools: Numerous lithic tools were planted by Shinichi Fujimura so he could be the first man to discover ancient stone tools in Japan. Snapped by photographer planting the items.
  • Dating of Human Skulls: University of Frankfurt professor made up the radiocarbon dates of human remains to suit his own theories about ‘primitive man’.

Nebraska Man

While the hoax of Piltdown Man lasted many decades the poor science that led to the presentation of Nebraska Man only lasted a few years. Henry Osborn, of the American Museum of Natural History, reported in 1922, that he had discovered a fossil tooth near Snake Brook in western Nebraska. Upon first analysis it was said that the molar appeared to have common characteristics of both human and ape. The tooth suddenly became known as Nebraska Man and the London Gazette published a sketch drawing of a stooped cave man walking through a desolate landscape with other Nebraska’s (mum and the children) in the background.

The drawings and the academic following were developed from just one single tooth. William Bryan, a researcher, vehemently opposed the conclusions citing that it was very poor science to draw conclusions of the whole from such an insignificant portion. The professional world criticised him harshly.

Five years after Nebraska Man had influenced so many professional scientists, more remains were found from the same site. Sadly for those hoodwinked academics it was proved beyond doubt that the tooth belonged to a pig. Drawings of Nebraska and his family were immediately withdrawn from evolutionary textbooks.

Legitimate Archaeology

Respected archaeologists attempt to differentiate their research results from those reached by pseudoarchaeologists, by stressing their accepted methodologies used throughout the process, the peer evaluation process and review stages, and the general systematic and transparent approach to data recovery in the field. Yet, as long as archaeology is attractive to government ideologies or private conspiracies then pseudoarchaeology will continue to flourish.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
I HV an assignment that I HV to do,so it based psuedoarcheology.So I HV to write an article based this question Why psuedoarcheology is not a credible encounter?
Doda - 8-Jul-16 @ 4:23 PM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Glen
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I have a very old small clay jug that was dug up by a friends grandfather just before the Second World War about 1meter below the surface I would…
    16 November 2020
  • Coupal24
    Re: Etched Vase: How to Discover its Origins?
    I found 3 pieces of different pottery in the brook out back. This was ancient indian land . Curious to know the…
    8 November 2020
  • Coupal24
    Re: Etched Vase: How to Discover its Origins?
    OK i found 3 different pieces of pottery in brook so far wondering age and if they are old enough that indians…
    8 November 2020
  • Chad
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    Hello, I found what looks like a hatchet type tool slightly in the ground near an old Walnut Grove. Is there a way I can send picture or show it?
    26 October 2020
  • OliRobbo
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hello there, My grandad found an old piece of pottery sticking out of a molehill near the site of a Middle Age church which is no longer standing…
    14 October 2020
  • Gill
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    Hello, I come across a stone on a beech on the NE coat of Scotland, Caithness (beside a castle - I forget the name but can look it up if you…
    18 September 2020
  • lil boy
    Re: Pottery Experts
    i found old pottery it is several different colors. it was 4ft in the ground
    23 August 2020
  • Marg
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I have been left this dish which I think is very old but probably worthless and would like very much to know more about it It is 13 x 10 inches…
    22 August 2020
  • Abulbarakat
    Re: Tools of the Archaeologist
    I an an archeologist from Kano state Nigeria, and I have located several archaeological sites that are yet to be studied as the…
    19 August 2020
  • Pete
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Can I send a photo of a pot I picked up. It looks Aztec or Mexican to me,but would like to know. Thanx
    18 August 2020