Home > Places of Interest > Stonehenge

Stonehenge

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 20 Nov 2014 | comments*Discuss
 
Stonehenge Marlborough Downs Druids

The colossal size, its endurance for 4000 years and its mysterious symbolism certainly make Stonehenge Britain's national icon. Although researchers are still unclear as to its original purpose, it is most likely that it was a religious place of worship to some outer deity or a grand memorial to earthbound nobility.

Location

Stonehenge is surrounded by hundreds of burial mounds, known as barrows, located in an expansive plain about 2 miles west of the English town of Amesbury in Wiltshire. We can only guess at the purpose of the enormous human endeavours expended to build such a site. It is a place smoking of mystery and intrigue, firing imaginations of archaeologists and tourists as to the reason, use and construction.

Two Rings of Stone

The remains today at Stonehenge poorly reflect the impressive original structure. What are observed are merely the ruins of a once magnificent twin ring formation. Some of the original stones have been removed, some have fallen over and it is suspected that other missing stones have been cut up and used for other construction purposes by previous generations.

The Inner Ring

The smaller, inner circle is the oldest. It is believed to have been built around 2000 BC. These stones, although smaller than the ones used in the outer ring, are still enormous, weighing in at up to four tons each. The stones are natural bluestone and no local supply is within the region. The stones may have been quarried around 230 miles away in the Prescelly Mountains of southern Wales.

The Outer Ring

The larger, outer circle is regarded to be about 500 years younger than the inner ring. The stones of this massive circle can weigh as much as 50 tons. They are natural sandstones, called sarsens, found scattered all over the English chalk downs. The stones are likely to have been transported to the site from neighbouring Marlborough Downs about 20 miles to the north.

With both rings erected Stonehenge was completed around 1500 BC with no further additions after this time.

The Builders

Whoever the builders were one thing is certain, they were an ancient people with immense skill in quarrying and moving extremely large stones. So skilled, in fact, that modern engineers would struggle today to achieve the same architectural feat.

The most popular attribution is the Druids, a priestly class of ancient Celts. To be the builders they would have needed to have been existing as a well-organised society as early as 2000 BC. All archaeological evidence about the Druids tends to prove that they were a later society.

Archaeology suggests that a people group from the late Neolithic period began the site and that its furtherance was by subsequent generations involving higher limits of organisation and technology. For example, the great sarsen stones of the outer circle would have required no less than six hundred men to move then up the steep rise on route from Marlborough Downs.

The technology to erect the stones and cap them with lintels was nothing short of engineering innovation. A clever combination of dug holes, levers, gravity, ropes and hundreds of men, gracefully slid the gigantic stones into upright positions. Lintel stones were swung over the top and secured by jointing.

Exploited Excesses

Like many famous archaeological sites, Stonehenge as been attacked and exploited by commercialism. It is unlikely that further excavation of the site is practical, as digging beside the stones will undermine their stability. Therefore, the mystic that attracts so many to this site is certain to continue.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • SimSam
    Re: Gender Archaeology
    The article "archaeology and the study of gender" by Margaret W. Conkey and Janet D. Spector is a marvellous read on the theme of gender in…
    17 October 2017
  • Dick
    Re: Shinichi Fujimura
    I found a buried artifacts made by a human ashes, a massive cremation of human body during either Spanish or Japanese occupation . Those…
    9 October 2017
  • Jason
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I found a, what seems like clay, pot with a little spout near a dried up canal and was wondering how old it was and if it is worth anything. If…
    2 October 2017
  • riju
    Re: Academic Qualifications to Be An Archaeologist
    Sir I have completed BSC in geology. Is It possible for me to complete msc archaeology without completing…
    1 October 2017
  • Ajju
    Re: Academic Qualifications to Be An Archaeologist
    Sir I m the student of commerce stream. Can I do the archeology and beacome archaeologist or no
    29 September 2017
  • ArchaeologyExpert
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Nat - Your Question:Hi,I recently found a piece of pottery near some Roman ruins. How would I send you a picture to confirm if it is actually…
    27 September 2017
  • Nat
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi, I recently found a piece of pottery near some Roman ruins. How would I send you a picture to confirm if it is actually Roman? It looks like a…
    26 September 2017
  • Rob
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I also have a piece of Zuni Pottery from the archives of the Smithsonian, collect by Bill Stevenson in 1880-1882. It is marked with a number and I…
    24 September 2017
  • Rob
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi. I have a Brownfields' Ferncliffe Pottery Drip Pan. It is heavy ceramic or porcelain and has impressed mark circle. It says Brown on inside and…
    24 September 2017
  • No picture
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    @stu. This is difficult to envisage without a picture. You'd be better taking it to a museum or something.
    20 September 2017
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the ArchaeologyExpert website. Please read our Disclaimer.