Home > Areas of Specialisation > Cognitive Archaeology

Cognitive Archaeology

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 5 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Cognitive Archaeology Processualist

Cognitive archaeology is recognised as a sub-discipline of archaeology which is itself a sub-discipline of anthropology. The word ‘cognitive’ is derived from the Latin ‘cognoscere’, meaning 'to know'. Cognitive archaeology deals with the study of artefacts, sourced from the archaeological record, to arrive at conclusions about why and what ancient people were thinking when they built or used the objects under consideration.

Studying the Ancient Mind

The study of the cognitive processes of the ancient world cover a variety of perspectives including the abstract concepts of reasoning, perception, intelligence, and inference, and the more corporeal mental processes of comprehension, decision-making, education, and planning.

Meta-Reasoning of Ancient People

Extreme branches of cognitive archaeology, which have been under constant academic attack for their deviation from accepted norms, attempt to analyse cultural meta-reasoning involving concepts of belief, desires, and motivational stimuli.

Cognitive archaeologists study the part that ideology has played on the peoples of ancient societies. They investigate the remains that these people have left behind by considering the abstract ideas that are manifested in the archaeological record. It is a highly subjective task and one that is open to grand and heated debate.

Slow Acceptance by Mainstream

Cognitive archaeology has developed in relative isolation of its mother discipline and some in mainstream regard it as almost an heretical science. Because of this, those involved in developing the new sub-field have tended to offer very little dialogue with their straight colleagues. The inevitable split was unpleasant for both camps and as a result of the cognitive archaeologists’ establishing new sets of rules for archaeological interpretation to negate the pressure of academic challenges; they have been cynically renamed the ‘coggies’. The coggies prefer to define themselves as cognitive archaeologists or processualists.

Mind Mapping the Ancient Brain

Cynicism aside, the proponents of cognitive archaeology clearly see the human mind revealed in the archaeological record and know that humans do not behave solely under the control of their five senses but also decisions and practices are influenced by past experience, environment, and learned upbringing. These experiences form a person’s world-view and the cognitive archaeologist is attempting to recreate this as a cognition map – a kind of reverse mind mapping technique.

Motivation

Researchers have always been interested in what has motivated people in the past. Early attempts to quantify their cognitive processes were primitive and unstructured. Processualists have caused a rise in the more scientific approaches of investigation and study by paying closer attention to the context of artefacts found in the archaeological record and by drawing out every possible interpretation for consideration.

Interpretation

Multiple interpretations of artefacts have always been present in archaeology due to the individual archaeologist’s own bias through experience, knowledge, and cultural acquisition. For example, an archaeologist may explain that the layer of animal bones located on the floor of a digging square is the product of former animal sacrificial practices performed by religious priests. However, all that can be truly stated about the find is that they are animal bones laid down at a particular time in history.

Some mainstream archaeologists have criticised processualists, stating that only the actions of people are preserved in the archaeological record and not their thoughts. The cognitive archaeologists respond by arguing that the tangible artefacts are evidence of actions and that actions are the result of human thought that was governed by experience and beliefs.

Studying the Full Context

Every artefact discovered was intentionally created by human inspiration. Every tool fashioned by human hand demonstrates detailed knowledge and acquired skills. Studying these artefacts in the full context of their location, from the viewpoint of the cognitive process that was occurring at the time, can inform us about what those societies knew, how they thought, and why they did. This otherwise philosophical pursuit has strong connections with archaeology, not only in its need for objects from the archaeological record, but also that its aim is connected to the very heart of archaeological science: the behavioural processes of humanity.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Dinky
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    I, like so many others seek authentication for the many suspected anient stone tool/weapons Portable Rock Art.
    22 July 2019
  • Toni
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Found a half piece of pottery on the beach in Monterey. Looks like a small tea cup. It has a flower pattern around the top and a # 49 on the…
    21 July 2019
  • Wisselkind
    Re: Urban Archaeology
    Hi there. Is it safe to say that evidence of early human life on continuously inhabited urban sites in many cases is fragmentally preserved at…
    21 July 2019
  • Trixie
    Re: What Animal Bones Can Tell Us In Archaeology
    Digging deep in my garden I've found a skull,mainly the front&face encased in rock. I can see 2 smaller teeth…
    8 July 2019
  • PR King
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    Hello I am 14 years old boy trying to come to UK to solve the mistery
    29 June 2019
  • PR king
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    Hello I am 14 years old boy trying to come to UK and trying to solve the mistery
    29 June 2019
  • Bigl80
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I am wondering about this piece of pottery that I found on the ocean floor
    10 June 2019
  • Golflinks
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I found a large part of an old reddish clay flower pot under the original 9th golf green at the world's oldest golf course. during reconstruction,…
    30 May 2019
  • Rubee
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I’ve recently inherited a plate, it’s age 1865 thats been worked out through the stamp on the back however it has the ‘makers’ stamp THE RAOLIN…
    25 May 2019
  • Majid
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    Sir i have alot of stone in my village every stone has good symbols.i want your help about that and also i have pic of the antimaps on rocks
    20 May 2019