Home > Areas of Specialisation > Cognitive Archaeology

Cognitive Archaeology

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 5 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Cognitive Archaeology Processualist

Cognitive archaeology is recognised as a sub-discipline of archaeology which is itself a sub-discipline of anthropology. The word ‘cognitive’ is derived from the Latin ‘cognoscere’, meaning 'to know'. Cognitive archaeology deals with the study of artefacts, sourced from the archaeological record, to arrive at conclusions about why and what ancient people were thinking when they built or used the objects under consideration.

Studying the Ancient Mind

The study of the cognitive processes of the ancient world cover a variety of perspectives including the abstract concepts of reasoning, perception, intelligence, and inference, and the more corporeal mental processes of comprehension, decision-making, education, and planning.

Meta-Reasoning of Ancient People

Extreme branches of cognitive archaeology, which have been under constant academic attack for their deviation from accepted norms, attempt to analyse cultural meta-reasoning involving concepts of belief, desires, and motivational stimuli.

Cognitive archaeologists study the part that ideology has played on the peoples of ancient societies. They investigate the remains that these people have left behind by considering the abstract ideas that are manifested in the archaeological record. It is a highly subjective task and one that is open to grand and heated debate.

Slow Acceptance by Mainstream

Cognitive archaeology has developed in relative isolation of its mother discipline and some in mainstream regard it as almost an heretical science. Because of this, those involved in developing the new sub-field have tended to offer very little dialogue with their straight colleagues. The inevitable split was unpleasant for both camps and as a result of the cognitive archaeologists’ establishing new sets of rules for archaeological interpretation to negate the pressure of academic challenges; they have been cynically renamed the ‘coggies’. The coggies prefer to define themselves as cognitive archaeologists or processualists.

Mind Mapping the Ancient Brain

Cynicism aside, the proponents of cognitive archaeology clearly see the human mind revealed in the archaeological record and know that humans do not behave solely under the control of their five senses but also decisions and practices are influenced by past experience, environment, and learned upbringing. These experiences form a person’s world-view and the cognitive archaeologist is attempting to recreate this as a cognition map – a kind of reverse mind mapping technique.

Motivation

Researchers have always been interested in what has motivated people in the past. Early attempts to quantify their cognitive processes were primitive and unstructured. Processualists have caused a rise in the more scientific approaches of investigation and study by paying closer attention to the context of artefacts found in the archaeological record and by drawing out every possible interpretation for consideration.

Interpretation

Multiple interpretations of artefacts have always been present in archaeology due to the individual archaeologist’s own bias through experience, knowledge, and cultural acquisition. For example, an archaeologist may explain that the layer of animal bones located on the floor of a digging square is the product of former animal sacrificial practices performed by religious priests. However, all that can be truly stated about the find is that they are animal bones laid down at a particular time in history.

Some mainstream archaeologists have criticised processualists, stating that only the actions of people are preserved in the archaeological record and not their thoughts. The cognitive archaeologists respond by arguing that the tangible artefacts are evidence of actions and that actions are the result of human thought that was governed by experience and beliefs.

Studying the Full Context

Every artefact discovered was intentionally created by human inspiration. Every tool fashioned by human hand demonstrates detailed knowledge and acquired skills. Studying these artefacts in the full context of their location, from the viewpoint of the cognitive process that was occurring at the time, can inform us about what those societies knew, how they thought, and why they did. This otherwise philosophical pursuit has strong connections with archaeology, not only in its need for objects from the archaeological record, but also that its aim is connected to the very heart of archaeological science: the behavioural processes of humanity.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Judy
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    It has been my experience that the experts have what I call “textbook blindness”! They refuse to see or acknowledge the art literally carved in…
    20 January 2020
  • Will
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    I am retired and my lady will be this July. We live near Oberlin College in NE. Ohio, USA. Are there any amateur archaeology individuals…
    19 January 2020
  • Ross
    Re: Early Footprints
    If this were true, the scientific community would be ALL OVER IT - I smell a big rat here
    13 January 2020
  • Tonpol
    Re: Archaeological Interpretation
    Well what's the excatly the interpretation and analysis of archeology????
    2 January 2020
  • Michel
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    Hi, My name is Michel and I'm a huge fan of history and archaeology. Having said this my question is about your article, Archaeology as…
    29 December 2019
  • Michel
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    Hi, My name is Michel and I'm a huge fan of history and archaeology. Having said this my question is about your article, Archaeology as…
    29 December 2019
  • History Enthusiast
    Re: Henri Breuil
    My grandmother ( Ada Patterson Kuhn) was good friends with Henri Breuil (Abbé), and is mentioned in some cave paintings they discovered together in…
    26 December 2019
  • Marian
    Re: Glossary of Archaeology Terms
    What is an Archaeological Impact Assessment?
    21 December 2019
  • Terry
    Re: Rescue Archaeology
    I have been an amateur archaeologist for over 50 years, and have a great deal of practical experience in excavating sites from Iron Age through…
    16 December 2019
  • Maritime Archaeologi
    Re: Types of Archaeology
    I hope to discover Shipwrecks when I get into college, and I was wondering if Maritime Archaeology was the place to go or if there is another…
    16 December 2019