Home > Areas of Specialisation > Cognitive Archaeology

Cognitive Archaeology

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 5 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Cognitive Archaeology Processualist

Cognitive archaeology is recognised as a sub-discipline of archaeology which is itself a sub-discipline of anthropology. The word ‘cognitive’ is derived from the Latin ‘cognoscere’, meaning 'to know'. Cognitive archaeology deals with the study of artefacts, sourced from the archaeological record, to arrive at conclusions about why and what ancient people were thinking when they built or used the objects under consideration.

Studying the Ancient Mind

The study of the cognitive processes of the ancient world cover a variety of perspectives including the abstract concepts of reasoning, perception, intelligence, and inference, and the more corporeal mental processes of comprehension, decision-making, education, and planning.

Meta-Reasoning of Ancient People

Extreme branches of cognitive archaeology, which have been under constant academic attack for their deviation from accepted norms, attempt to analyse cultural meta-reasoning involving concepts of belief, desires, and motivational stimuli.

Cognitive archaeologists study the part that ideology has played on the peoples of ancient societies. They investigate the remains that these people have left behind by considering the abstract ideas that are manifested in the archaeological record. It is a highly subjective task and one that is open to grand and heated debate.

Slow Acceptance by Mainstream

Cognitive archaeology has developed in relative isolation of its mother discipline and some in mainstream regard it as almost an heretical science. Because of this, those involved in developing the new sub-field have tended to offer very little dialogue with their straight colleagues. The inevitable split was unpleasant for both camps and as a result of the cognitive archaeologists’ establishing new sets of rules for archaeological interpretation to negate the pressure of academic challenges; they have been cynically renamed the ‘coggies’. The coggies prefer to define themselves as cognitive archaeologists or processualists.

Mind Mapping the Ancient Brain

Cynicism aside, the proponents of cognitive archaeology clearly see the human mind revealed in the archaeological record and know that humans do not behave solely under the control of their five senses but also decisions and practices are influenced by past experience, environment, and learned upbringing. These experiences form a person’s world-view and the cognitive archaeologist is attempting to recreate this as a cognition map – a kind of reverse mind mapping technique.

Motivation

Researchers have always been interested in what has motivated people in the past. Early attempts to quantify their cognitive processes were primitive and unstructured. Processualists have caused a rise in the more scientific approaches of investigation and study by paying closer attention to the context of artefacts found in the archaeological record and by drawing out every possible interpretation for consideration.

Interpretation

Multiple interpretations of artefacts have always been present in archaeology due to the individual archaeologist’s own bias through experience, knowledge, and cultural acquisition. For example, an archaeologist may explain that the layer of animal bones located on the floor of a digging square is the product of former animal sacrificial practices performed by religious priests. However, all that can be truly stated about the find is that they are animal bones laid down at a particular time in history.

Some mainstream archaeologists have criticised processualists, stating that only the actions of people are preserved in the archaeological record and not their thoughts. The cognitive archaeologists respond by arguing that the tangible artefacts are evidence of actions and that actions are the result of human thought that was governed by experience and beliefs.

Studying the Full Context

Every artefact discovered was intentionally created by human inspiration. Every tool fashioned by human hand demonstrates detailed knowledge and acquired skills. Studying these artefacts in the full context of their location, from the viewpoint of the cognitive process that was occurring at the time, can inform us about what those societies knew, how they thought, and why they did. This otherwise philosophical pursuit has strong connections with archaeology, not only in its need for objects from the archaeological record, but also that its aim is connected to the very heart of archaeological science: the behavioural processes of humanity.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Awaiso
    Re: Palynology
    Kindly someone inform me what is geological application of palynology, in this page like archaeology application of palynology
    11 November 2019
  • Bea
    Re: Being Aware of Fake Archaeological Artefacts
    I have what seems to be a maya relic I found it in a storage that a Travelin Soldier left behind. Im…
    5 November 2019
  • Red
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I have what looks to be a very old all black clay pottery liquid container/pitcher of some kind it has small slash markings around where the liquid…
    31 October 2019
  • Hitesh
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    I have found a stone, it's triangular shape, but Something ring inside the stone.
    26 October 2019
  • Suri
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    I am a prof. in a college in Bangalore India, I would like to participate in your explorations,
    22 October 2019
  • Tweener
    Re: Dating Techniques In Archaeology
    Hy everyone I really like this platform, because is very interesting and educative in archaeological matters
    22 October 2019
  • Babaji
    Re: Classification
    How can a pottery artifact be classified?
    16 October 2019
  • Mpole
    Re: Types of Archaeology
    Hello, am Mpolerane undergraduate from Kyambogo university Uganda archaeology is one of my course unit but I like it so much
    8 October 2019
  • Robbie
    Re: Being Aware of Fake Archaeological Artefacts
    I looked on eBay for Roman rings and jewelry, a few year's ago, I bought a ring which was genuine but lost it…
    4 October 2019
  • Robbie
    Re: Being Aware of Fake Archaeological Artefacts
    I looked on eBay for Roman rings and jewelry, a few year's ago, I bought a ring which was genuine but lost it…
    4 October 2019