Home > Things to Know > Origins of Food Production

Origins of Food Production

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 5 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Origins Food Production Domestication

The origins of animal and plant domestication is considered an important development in human history by anthropologists and the sub-discipline field of archaeology is responsible for collecting the site data to enable study of this social advancement.

Purposeful Domestication

The deliberate planning and planting of crops or the purposeful domestication of wild animals marks a point of innovation and a greater complexity of social interaction and technological requirements in a society. It is traditionally presumed that the move from collecting wild food to farming food gave workers more leisure time and a better standard of life.

Lazy Days

However, hunter-gatherers had a relatively easy life anyway, with few pressures and little real worries. Ethnologists suspect that hunter-gatherers only worked as required, perhaps a few hours on a few days each week, and that this was sufficient to maintain their needs. Research has shown that the change to producing domesticated food types is one that left workers busier than before and with new pressures such as market demands, price returns, weather conditions, pests and diseases, seed collection, reproduction difficulties, and taxes.

Art for the Elite Only

An increase in leisure time was only for the elite classes and especially those who owned or ruled over the lands. Peasant workers received very little benefit from the domestication process. Society, as a whole, did benefit by releasing a small number of the elite to religious, governmental, and even artistic pursuits.

Food domestication appears to differ from the Old World to the New World and there are two main food source divisions that should be considered: Plant and animal.

Old World Domestication

Plants

The Old World is primarily Europe and the Middle East. There are a number of important grain crops that were domesticated in these regions. The most familiar in the West are wheat, barley, and rye, along with numerous feed grasses that were used for animal production, while in the Middle East lentils, nuts, and dates were being domesticated with rice and millet predominating Far East trends.

Important also in the process of domestication was the non-food crops such as oil producing plants (sunflowers, olives, etc) and utilitarian crops such as cotton, hemp, and flax.

Animals

Archaeologists believe that the earliest domesticated animal species was the dog. A domesticated form of the wolf was used for personal protection from intruders while other varieties proved useful in flushing out wild game or even killing in the hunt. Other uses were as workers such as pulling sleds.

As food sources, palaeontologists have discovered so many sheep and goat remains that it is unquestionable that these animals were under early human control especially in the Middle East. The Far East, although also using sheep and goats, were strongly developing species such as the pig and birds including domesticating the chicken and duck.

Oxen, cows, horses, and other large animals were not the first to be domesticated and the harnessing of these animals for food and production did not enter until a much later time.

New World Domestication

Plants

The Americas of the New World were slowly developing important crops like peppers, beans, potatoes, peanuts, coffee, and tomatoes. Many of these crops have become the staples of modern economies and international cuisine. But equally important are the non-food crops that produced medicinal drugs and tobacco.

Animals

As in the West, so too in the New World was the dog an early contender for domestication. Sadly, for the Central American dog, he was more desired as a delicacy than a labourer. The Aztecs, for example, bred the small, hairless Chihuahua as a meat source along with guinea pigs.

South American’s had their equivalent of the Middle Eastern camel in the form of the llama and the alpaca, both of which were raised for transport and meat.

Archaeological Differences

Archaeologists find distinct site differences between pre and post domestication. Architecturally, the sites of post domestication show larger, close quartered structures that yield evidence of greater populations.

The architectural features are more permanent in their construction and there are purpose built structures for storage facilities. Socially, there is often artefact evidence supporting a widening gap in social equality and often an elite ruling class can be seen emerging.

The dry Middle East contains many archaeological sites that are well preserved from both the pre and post domestication periods. Israel, Jordan, and Syria all play host to former habitation sites were permanent plastered brick huts, grinding stones, and cereal grains show the transition of human development from hunter-gatherer to domesticated food farmer.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Linda Goetz
    Re: Harappa, Punjab
    I recently was on a trip to Turkey and stopped along my sites, Ephesus Knidos and St Nicholas Island. I would love to assist in preservation or on…
    18 September 2018
  • DrRJP
    Re: Heinrich Schliemann
    I've read this article (or should I say a hatchet job) about Heinrich Schliemann who is known for discovering the city of Troy and nowhere in…
    17 September 2018
  • "benno"
    Re: What Animal Bones Can Tell Us In Archaeology
    Have pig bones been found in any excavations of Canaanite tombs?
    5 September 2018
  • Sisi
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    I just want to know the guidlines of this hobby .To me most of the obove is not really important its just a bunch of words that are…
    2 September 2018
  • Gemma Crook
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi I found what I think is pottery. How do i get it dated and where as I want to find how old it could be. Thanks Gemma
    31 August 2018
  • Sasi
    Re: Academic Qualifications to Be An Archaeologist
    Sir I am completed 12th standard in HEC iam interested to become archeologist it's possible for me to do…
    27 August 2018
  • oriane007
    Re: Conservators of Underwater Archaeology
    I would like am advice on this ancient looking pottery, probably found at sea, whom my father purchased in the 70s…
    22 August 2018
  • Nafsycool
    Re: Types of Archaeology
    According to what flomagic said the course archaeology is barely known and its been offerer by 4 to 5 universities in Nigeria if I am not…
    16 August 2018
  • Nafsycool
    Re: Types of Archaeology
    According to what flomagic said the course archaeology is barely known and its been offerer by 4 to 5 universities in Nigeria if I am not…
    16 August 2018
  • Alex
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I have an interesting piece of antique pottery. It reminds somewhat of Voynich Manuscript characters. How can I have someone look at it with an…
    15 August 2018
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the ArchaeologyExpert website. Please read our Disclaimer.