Home > Things to Know > Origins of Food Production

Origins of Food Production

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 5 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Origins Food Production Domestication

The origins of animal and plant domestication is considered an important development in human history by anthropologists and the sub-discipline field of archaeology is responsible for collecting the site data to enable study of this social advancement.

Purposeful Domestication

The deliberate planning and planting of crops or the purposeful domestication of wild animals marks a point of innovation and a greater complexity of social interaction and technological requirements in a society. It is traditionally presumed that the move from collecting wild food to farming food gave workers more leisure time and a better standard of life.

Lazy Days

However, hunter-gatherers had a relatively easy life anyway, with few pressures and little real worries. Ethnologists suspect that hunter-gatherers only worked as required, perhaps a few hours on a few days each week, and that this was sufficient to maintain their needs. Research has shown that the change to producing domesticated food types is one that left workers busier than before and with new pressures such as market demands, price returns, weather conditions, pests and diseases, seed collection, reproduction difficulties, and taxes.

Art for the Elite Only

An increase in leisure time was only for the elite classes and especially those who owned or ruled over the lands. Peasant workers received very little benefit from the domestication process. Society, as a whole, did benefit by releasing a small number of the elite to religious, governmental, and even artistic pursuits.

Food domestication appears to differ from the Old World to the New World and there are two main food source divisions that should be considered: Plant and animal.

Old World Domestication

Plants

The Old World is primarily Europe and the Middle East. There are a number of important grain crops that were domesticated in these regions. The most familiar in the West are wheat, barley, and rye, along with numerous feed grasses that were used for animal production, while in the Middle East lentils, nuts, and dates were being domesticated with rice and millet predominating Far East trends.

Important also in the process of domestication was the non-food crops such as oil producing plants (sunflowers, olives, etc) and utilitarian crops such as cotton, hemp, and flax.

Animals

Archaeologists believe that the earliest domesticated animal species was the dog. A domesticated form of the wolf was used for personal protection from intruders while other varieties proved useful in flushing out wild game or even killing in the hunt. Other uses were as workers such as pulling sleds.

As food sources, palaeontologists have discovered so many sheep and goat remains that it is unquestionable that these animals were under early human control especially in the Middle East. The Far East, although also using sheep and goats, were strongly developing species such as the pig and birds including domesticating the chicken and duck.

Oxen, cows, horses, and other large animals were not the first to be domesticated and the harnessing of these animals for food and production did not enter until a much later time.

New World Domestication

Plants

The Americas of the New World were slowly developing important crops like peppers, beans, potatoes, peanuts, coffee, and tomatoes. Many of these crops have become the staples of modern economies and international cuisine. But equally important are the non-food crops that produced medicinal drugs and tobacco.

Animals

As in the West, so too in the New World was the dog an early contender for domestication. Sadly, for the Central American dog, he was more desired as a delicacy than a labourer. The Aztecs, for example, bred the small, hairless Chihuahua as a meat source along with guinea pigs.

South American’s had their equivalent of the Middle Eastern camel in the form of the llama and the alpaca, both of which were raised for transport and meat.

Archaeological Differences

Archaeologists find distinct site differences between pre and post domestication. Architecturally, the sites of post domestication show larger, close quartered structures that yield evidence of greater populations.

The architectural features are more permanent in their construction and there are purpose built structures for storage facilities. Socially, there is often artefact evidence supporting a widening gap in social equality and often an elite ruling class can be seen emerging.

The dry Middle East contains many archaeological sites that are well preserved from both the pre and post domestication periods. Israel, Jordan, and Syria all play host to former habitation sites were permanent plastered brick huts, grinding stones, and cereal grains show the transition of human development from hunter-gatherer to domesticated food farmer.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • AxR
    Re: Etched Vase: How to Discover its Origins?
    I have recently come into possession of something that I was told is a turtle shell with a rather primitive…
    14 February 2019
  • Charlotte
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    Hi I am currently studying for A levels and am looking for a dig I can join in the summer break in the UK. Are you able to…
    3 February 2019
  • Jonathan
    Re: Types of Archaeology
    Hello my name is Jackson from Tanzania I persuade History at the University of Dodoma (UDOM) undergraduate level but Archaeology is among of…
    31 January 2019
  • The Stratman
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    Hello, I'm a man, 63 years long and looking for some digging in the UK. I'v some experiences in this, did some digging at my…
    31 January 2019
  • Kat
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I found a piece of pottery on the beach in Nova Scotia. I was wondering if I could email you a picture and tell me if it means anything or just a…
    24 January 2019
  • Armaan
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    Hi there, I am 17 years old and a junior in high school in the UK. I am interested in volunteering at a dig in July 2019 and…
    22 January 2019
  • ArchaeologicallyChal
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    Is there any where available to take an item (stone tool) to be properly authenticated? Thank you
    16 January 2019
  • JOREN
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    I live in a town in Perthshire called Coupar Angus. I am interested in finding out if there is any opportunities in this area to take up…
    15 January 2019
  • Willy
    Re: Understanding Weights And Measures In Archaeology
    Ancient grave sites have length markers, but no #s or legend. British grave markers, if red/white is 1…
    12 January 2019
  • Ryan
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Good day. I have acquired a tile that I know nothing about. I'm hoping someone will be able to help with regards to age, production origin etc.…
    11 January 2019