Home > Archaeology Myths > Pseudo-Archaeology

Pseudo-Archaeology

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 8 Jul 2016 | comments*Discuss
 
Pseudoarchaeology Greek False

The word ‘pseudo’ is a Greek word meaning false apparent or supposed but not real. When prefixed to the word archaeology the term pseudoarchaeology simply means false archaeology.

It can be false for a number of reasons. Firstly, the archaeological methodology may not be undertaken using accepted scientific methods. Secondly, the interpretation of the data or the material remains excavated may not be consistent with the usual practices of analysis. Thirdly, the artefacts ‘discovered’ could be fakes or the entire archaeological concept could be orchestrated as a hoax.

False Science

Pseudoarchaeology is sometimes called fantastic archaeology but by whatever name it is given it is best identified as pseudo-science dressed in archaeological garments. Any archaeological theory, excavation site, or published results of excavations that do not conform to accepted archaeological practices generally fall into the category of pseudoarchaeology.

Nationalism

A frequent motivation to engage in pseudoarchaeology is radical nationalism. Imperial ideologies of the recent past used the results of archaeology to advance their empires. Often it was considered necessary to fake the data in order to pursue a particular emphasis for the nation. Some nations thought that re-writing history via archaeology would benefit their political aims.

Other motivations to enter into this pseudo-science could be religious dogma, anthropological theory, or revisionist historical interpretation. Archaeology is often enthused by romantic myths and legends. If the real science of archaeology were to make a discovery that rendered the national tale as a proven myth then cultural history would be shaken. Some people feel that it is better to ‘rework’ the evidence than to alter fanciful history.

Notorious Examples

There is no serious rocket science to presenting archaeological forgeries. Any artefact that simply looks old and is somewhat obscure as to its identification can be presented to the public (and even academic professionals) and most will believe it if the presenter has some trappings of authority.

There are literally thousands of archaeological frauds, fakes, and hoaxes that would be termed pseudoarchaeology. Here are a few examples that reached to global deception.

  • Piltdown Man fossils: These were the fabrication of a human skull and a chimp jawbone in an attempt to prove human evolution. Exposed as a fraud.
  • The Cardiff Giant: Made by P T Barnum (of circus fame) and displayed as the original after the British Museum refused to release the one he said he had found.
  • Stone Age Japanese tools: Numerous lithic tools were planted by Shinichi Fujimura so he could be the first man to discover ancient stone tools in Japan. Snapped by photographer planting the items.
  • Dating of Human Skulls: University of Frankfurt professor made up the radiocarbon dates of human remains to suit his own theories about ‘primitive man’.

Nebraska Man

While the hoax of Piltdown Man lasted many decades the poor science that led to the presentation of Nebraska Man only lasted a few years. Henry Osborn, of the American Museum of Natural History, reported in 1922, that he had discovered a fossil tooth near Snake Brook in western Nebraska. Upon first analysis it was said that the molar appeared to have common characteristics of both human and ape. The tooth suddenly became known as Nebraska Man and the London Gazette published a sketch drawing of a stooped cave man walking through a desolate landscape with other Nebraska’s (mum and the children) in the background.

The drawings and the academic following were developed from just one single tooth. William Bryan, a researcher, vehemently opposed the conclusions citing that it was very poor science to draw conclusions of the whole from such an insignificant portion. The professional world criticised him harshly.

Five years after Nebraska Man had influenced so many professional scientists, more remains were found from the same site. Sadly for those hoodwinked academics it was proved beyond doubt that the tooth belonged to a pig. Drawings of Nebraska and his family were immediately withdrawn from evolutionary textbooks.

Legitimate Archaeology

Respected archaeologists attempt to differentiate their research results from those reached by pseudoarchaeologists, by stressing their accepted methodologies used throughout the process, the peer evaluation process and review stages, and the general systematic and transparent approach to data recovery in the field. Yet, as long as archaeology is attractive to government ideologies or private conspiracies then pseudoarchaeology will continue to flourish.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
I HV an assignment that I HV to do,so it based psuedoarcheology.So I HV to write an article based this question Why psuedoarcheology is not a credible encounter?
Doda - 8-Jul-16 @ 4:23 PM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Judy
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    It has been my experience that the experts have what I call “textbook blindness”! They refuse to see or acknowledge the art literally carved in…
    20 January 2020
  • Will
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    I am retired and my lady will be this July. We live near Oberlin College in NE. Ohio, USA. Are there any amateur archaeology individuals…
    19 January 2020
  • Ross
    Re: Early Footprints
    If this were true, the scientific community would be ALL OVER IT - I smell a big rat here
    13 January 2020
  • Tonpol
    Re: Archaeological Interpretation
    Well what's the excatly the interpretation and analysis of archeology????
    2 January 2020
  • Michel
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    Hi, My name is Michel and I'm a huge fan of history and archaeology. Having said this my question is about your article, Archaeology as…
    29 December 2019
  • Michel
    Re: Archaeology as a Hobby
    Hi, My name is Michel and I'm a huge fan of history and archaeology. Having said this my question is about your article, Archaeology as…
    29 December 2019
  • History Enthusiast
    Re: Henri Breuil
    My grandmother ( Ada Patterson Kuhn) was good friends with Henri Breuil (Abbé), and is mentioned in some cave paintings they discovered together in…
    26 December 2019
  • Marian
    Re: Glossary of Archaeology Terms
    What is an Archaeological Impact Assessment?
    21 December 2019
  • Terry
    Re: Rescue Archaeology
    I have been an amateur archaeologist for over 50 years, and have a great deal of practical experience in excavating sites from Iron Age through…
    16 December 2019
  • Maritime Archaeologi
    Re: Types of Archaeology
    I hope to discover Shipwrecks when I get into college, and I was wondering if Maritime Archaeology was the place to go or if there is another…
    16 December 2019