Home > Areas of Specialisation > Cognitive Archaeology

Cognitive Archaeology

By: Grahame Johnston - Updated: 5 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Cognitive Archaeology Processualist

Cognitive archaeology is recognised as a sub-discipline of archaeology which is itself a sub-discipline of anthropology. The word ‘cognitive’ is derived from the Latin ‘cognoscere’, meaning 'to know'. Cognitive archaeology deals with the study of artefacts, sourced from the archaeological record, to arrive at conclusions about why and what ancient people were thinking when they built or used the objects under consideration.

Studying the Ancient Mind

The study of the cognitive processes of the ancient world cover a variety of perspectives including the abstract concepts of reasoning, perception, intelligence, and inference, and the more corporeal mental processes of comprehension, decision-making, education, and planning.

Meta-Reasoning of Ancient People

Extreme branches of cognitive archaeology, which have been under constant academic attack for their deviation from accepted norms, attempt to analyse cultural meta-reasoning involving concepts of belief, desires, and motivational stimuli.

Cognitive archaeologists study the part that ideology has played on the peoples of ancient societies. They investigate the remains that these people have left behind by considering the abstract ideas that are manifested in the archaeological record. It is a highly subjective task and one that is open to grand and heated debate.

Slow Acceptance by Mainstream

Cognitive archaeology has developed in relative isolation of its mother discipline and some in mainstream regard it as almost an heretical science. Because of this, those involved in developing the new sub-field have tended to offer very little dialogue with their straight colleagues. The inevitable split was unpleasant for both camps and as a result of the cognitive archaeologists’ establishing new sets of rules for archaeological interpretation to negate the pressure of academic challenges; they have been cynically renamed the ‘coggies’. The coggies prefer to define themselves as cognitive archaeologists or processualists.

Mind Mapping the Ancient Brain

Cynicism aside, the proponents of cognitive archaeology clearly see the human mind revealed in the archaeological record and know that humans do not behave solely under the control of their five senses but also decisions and practices are influenced by past experience, environment, and learned upbringing. These experiences form a person’s world-view and the cognitive archaeologist is attempting to recreate this as a cognition map – a kind of reverse mind mapping technique.

Motivation

Researchers have always been interested in what has motivated people in the past. Early attempts to quantify their cognitive processes were primitive and unstructured. Processualists have caused a rise in the more scientific approaches of investigation and study by paying closer attention to the context of artefacts found in the archaeological record and by drawing out every possible interpretation for consideration.

Interpretation

Multiple interpretations of artefacts have always been present in archaeology due to the individual archaeologist’s own bias through experience, knowledge, and cultural acquisition. For example, an archaeologist may explain that the layer of animal bones located on the floor of a digging square is the product of former animal sacrificial practices performed by religious priests. However, all that can be truly stated about the find is that they are animal bones laid down at a particular time in history.

Some mainstream archaeologists have criticised processualists, stating that only the actions of people are preserved in the archaeological record and not their thoughts. The cognitive archaeologists respond by arguing that the tangible artefacts are evidence of actions and that actions are the result of human thought that was governed by experience and beliefs.

Studying the Full Context

Every artefact discovered was intentionally created by human inspiration. Every tool fashioned by human hand demonstrates detailed knowledge and acquired skills. Studying these artefacts in the full context of their location, from the viewpoint of the cognitive process that was occurring at the time, can inform us about what those societies knew, how they thought, and why they did. This otherwise philosophical pursuit has strong connections with archaeology, not only in its need for objects from the archaeological record, but also that its aim is connected to the very heart of archaeological science: the behavioural processes of humanity.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • dcroome
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    My parents have a stone object 14 cm long, 12 cm wide and flat at one end for approx 2 cm, then narrowing to 8 cm wide and rounded off at other…
    22 April 2019
  • Alisa
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I don't know what kind of pottery it's redish in color the bottom is about 7 inches round and the neck is about 1 inch tall and 3 inches wide it's…
    22 April 2019
  • Jess
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I found a small piece of potary with a lot if wear and lots of small markings. Looks like there was handles on it and one point and they broke off…
    19 April 2019
  • Pulse
    Re: Academic Qualifications to Be An Archaeologist
    I'm doing B. Arch and I want to become a archeologist.. What are the qualifications required?
    1 April 2019
  • Chris
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi. I’ve recently brought a few items from a local auction and I was wondering if you would be able to tell me if they are genuine or not? A…
    31 March 2019
  • Will
    Re: Pottery Experts
    Hi. I have found what I think is redwear there are no marks on the pot which has a small opening. It was found on a beach in England about 10…
    28 March 2019
  • Cuc
    Re: Pottery Experts
    I have a wide pot with a lid and c shaped handles facing outward and all around the outside of the pot. I think it is a yokut pot. But would love…
    27 March 2019
  • Wabblit
    Re: Stone Tool Experts
    Hello I’ve found a very unusual stone and am convinced it’s something very old possibly a tool. How or who can I show it to to find out more??
    23 March 2019
  • Foxy
    Re: Be a Volunteer Archaeologist
    Always wanted to go on a dig.. ever since I was young and heard of the king tut find I was hooked on ancient sites and what those…
    19 March 2019
  • shiva
    Re: Archaeological Excavation
    i'm studying for competative exam. so i need to learn more about Archaelological Excavation. please help me.
    14 March 2019